Closure Possibility Worth Pursuing

No. This posting is not about Nur Fitri Azmeer Nordin.

He was a pedophile caught red handed and now serving time. Second chance or otherwise, that is none of my concerns.

However, his case should also be viewed on the possibility – no matter how remote it might well be – that it could provide leads to close cases which have long haunted us.

I am talking about the cases of young children going missing and - in the case of 8-year old Nurin Jazlin (May Allah rest her soul, Amin) - murdered, where the perpetrator/s was/were never caught.

Could not our investigators liaise with UK’s Metropolitan Police to trawl the data retrieved from the local pedophile to see if any of the more than 30,000 sick images could provide leads to the unresolved cases?

Potentially, this task would require hearts that are diamond hard and stomach steely strong due to the extreme nature of the said images and videos, but what if, what if, there is the slightest of chance of a lead found.

Remote, sure, but….

 

The pedophile is a Malaysian Malay who could well have included such words that reflected his demographic origins while searching the net to fulfill his demented fantasies.

Typing the above makes me feel sick to the core.

What kind of creature would do such a thing in the first place? God forbid.

Any kind of lead that could put a closure to the hurt, the feeling of helplessness, and the anguish of parents who have lost their loved ones needs to be pursued.

It a worthy cause that should be taken.

Uphill Gostanning

"The officers' misconduct violated regulations, so we're in the process of asking them to explain the allegations against them," said MACC chief commissioner Datuk Seri Abu Kassim Mohamed, according to Bernama.

Is “in the process of” the formalspeak of the more familiar “on the way” informalspeak?

“On the way”, by the way, is a way overused phrased which does not specify the when-about, the how-about or the where-abouts of its utterer to, usually, the question of: “Where are you?”

The officers’ in the above statement, of course, refers to the trio found by a Royal Commission Inquiry as having “driven to commit suicide by the aggressive and relentless interrogation” one Teoh Beng Hock (RIP), the former political aide to Selangor Exco, Ean Yong Hian Wah.

That was nearly three years ago (minus three months or so) on July 16, 2009 when the late Teoh was found dead at Plaza Masalam in Shah Alam.

Three years after the tragic incident and they are still “in the process”.

The RCI perhaps? Ah yes, the RCI.

But shouldn’t there be an internal procedure dealing with cases of death - especially one so suspicious – of accused (more so when involving a mere witness) in custody? Isn’t this supposed to be an automatic trigger for ALL legitimate enforcement bodies throughout the world?

They were suspended: Yep. So, weren’t there any “explanation” made then?

Really can’t recall if all three officers had their say during the RCI. If they had, then having another round of explaining is surely an exercise of repetitively recurring redundancy.

And, if they were suspended pre-RCI finding, what other “disciplinary actions” can be taken against the trio based on their explanations, which I supposed would be “on the way”?

By the way, according to Bernama, all three officers’ suspension has since been lifted and they are no longer with the Selangor office.

The wheels of justice are really “in the process” of turning in this one.